Abstract

Political conservatives are happier than liberals. We proposed that this happiness gap is accounted for by specific
attitude and personality differences associated with positive adjustment and mental health. In contrast, a prominent
social psychological explanation of the gap is that conservatives, who are described as fearful, defensive, and low
in self-esteem, will rationalize away social inequalities in order to justify the status quo (system justification). In 4
studies, conservatives expressed greater personal agency (e.g., personal control, responsibility), more positive
outlook (e.g., optimism, self-worth),
more transcendent moral beliefs (e.g., greater religiosity, greater moral clarity,
less tolerance of transgressions), and a generalized belief in fairness, and these differences accounted for the
happiness gap. These patterns are consistent with the positive adjustment explanation.