Abstract
Political conservatives are happier than
liberals. We proposed that this happiness gap is accounted for by
specific
attitude and personality differences associated with positive
adjustment and mental health. In contrast, a prominent
social psychological
explanation of the gap is that conservatives, who are described as fearful,
defensive, and low
in self-esteem, will rationalize away social inequalities
in order to justify the status quo (system justification). In 4
studies,
conservatives expressed greater personal agency (e.g., personal control,
responsibility), more positive
outlook (e.g., optimism, self-worth),
more transcendent moral beliefs (e.g., greater religiosity,
greater moral clarity,
less tolerance of transgressions), and a generalized
belief in fairness, and these differences accounted for the
happiness
gap. These patterns are consistent
with the positive adjustment
explanation.