click here to download a
formatted
copy
ADVANCED RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (SOP 6219C)
Fall 2007 Class Times: TR 6-7 Periods Location: T: PSY 230; R: PSY 130
Barry R. Schlenker
Office: PSY 269
Phone: 392-0601, ext. 253
e-mail: schlenkr@ufl.edu
Office Hours: TR 8 & by appointment
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Objective: The objective
of the course is to provide graduate students with the fundamentals of research
methodology that are necessary to prepare them for independent careers in
social psychological research. Students are assumed to have a strong intrinsic
interest in understanding the rationale, assumptions, advantages, and
disadvantages of the methods used by social psychologists. It also is assumed
that you have had undergraduate courses in research methods and statistics.
Course topics fall into three
broad, interrelated categories: scientific thinking, research procedures and
methodology, and statistical considerations. Under scientific thinking, we will
examine the nature of the scientific method and its application to
understanding, predicting, and influencing human behavior. In this context, we
will discuss the philosophy of science, including such topics as scientific
explanation, determinism and causality, and objective vs. subjective aspects of
science. Under research procedures and methodology, we will examine specific
fundamentals and issues associated with descriptive, correlational, and
experimental research. These include
such topics as scaling and measurement (e.g., construction of attitude scales),
reliability and validity, scientific sampling, experimental design, and
research ethics. Finally, under
statistical considerations, we will discuss the role of statistics in
behavioral research.
Required Readings
Texts:
Whitley, B. E., Jr.
(2002). Principles of
research in behavioral science (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Whitley is the primary
textbook for the course. It provides a graduate-level treatment of
methodological fundamentals in social psychology. Abelson offers an excellent
discussion of the role of statistics in behavioral research.
In addition, specific days
will include the discussion of central topics and debates. The readings on
these occasions will consist of articles that explore specific issues that have
enduring, often controversial, importance.
Articles:
Is social psychology a
science?
Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
Schlenker, B. R. (1974). Social psychology and
science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1-15.
What kind of science should
social psychology be?
Rozin, P.
(2001). Social psychology and
science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2-14.
Branden, N. (1996).
Taking responsibility: Self-reliance and the accountable life.
New York: Simon & Schuster. (Chapter 2, freedom & responsibility)
Moderators vs. Mediators: How
to Tell Them Apart
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The
moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:
Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
If you are
interested in further information, check out these sites:
Dave
Kenny’s web page on mediation: http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
http://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm
(Sobel test for mediation effects)
www.public.asu.edu/~davidpm/ripl/mediate.htm
Spencer,
S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why
experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining
psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89,
845-851.
External Validity
Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. G., & Bushman, B. J.
(1999). Research in the psychological laboratory? Truth or triviality. Current
Directions in Psychological Research, 8, 3-9.
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the
laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology's view of human
nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
Using Self-Report
Measures: A Cautionary Tale
Schwartz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions
shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93-105.
Research Writing
Sternberg, R. J. (1992). How to win acceptances by
psychology journals: 21 tips for better writing. APS Observer, 5, 12-14.
Bem, D. (1987). Writing the empirical journal article.
In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Darley (Eds.) The compleat academic (pp.
171-201). New York: Random House.
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the
results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196-217.
Grading
Your grade will be based on
two elements: (1) Class contributions, including your participation in class
discussions, and (2) your performance on three exams. The exams are scheduled
for Tuesday, September 25 (Exam 1), Tuesday, October 30 (Exam 2), and Tuesday,
December 4 (Exam 3). More information will be provided about these as we go
along.
Class attendance is expected.
It goes without saying that the class contribution component of your grade
takes a big hit if you miss class. I’ll be glad to provide personal feedback
about the class contribution component of your grade as we go along. If you
have any questions about it, please feel free to talk to me.
Class Topics
Class time will be devoted to
the discussion of a limited number of specific topics. Class coverage must be selective, because we
cannot possibly cover in class all of the material in the texts during the
semester. You are responsible for
mastering the material in the texts, regardless of whether we talk about a
specific topic in class.
I will try to cover as much
as possible during the semester, but I would rather explore a smaller number of
topics more fully than skim through volumes of information that merely
regurgitates the text. Nonetheless, if you have any questions about material in
the text, please ask them during or after class. Or, if you read about a topic
that you would like to cover during class and you think might not be on the
coverage list (or we already passed it over), please let me know. The topics
are flexible and can be modified based on class interests.
Here is the tentative list of
topics.
1. Scientific Method
2. Philosophy of Science
Positions on Science (Positivism, Post-positivism,
& more)
Interplay: Theories and Data
What Makes a Good Theory?
3. Types of Research
4. Measurement, Reliability, and Validity
5. Correlation, Regression, and Statistical Control
EXAM 1
6. Structure & Logic of Experimental Designs – Experimental
Control
Experimental validities and threats to validity
Interrelationships between design and statistics
7. Quasi-Experimental Designs
8. Social Psychology of Behavioral Research
EXAM 2
9. Observational Methods
10. Self-Report Methods
11. External Validity
12. Sampling
13. Ethics
14. Writing
EXAM 3
Readings for the Exams
Exam 1
Whitley: Chapters 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Readings: Social
Psychology as Science or History (Schlenker / Gergen)
What Form Should Social Psychology Be?
(Rozin / Branden)
Mediation
and Moderation (Baron & Kenny / Spencer, Zanna, & Fong)
Exam 2
Whitley: Chapters 6, 7, 9, 10, 13
Abelson: Chapters 1-6
Exam 3
Whitley: Chapters 3, 11, 12,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Abelson: Chapters 7-9
Readings: External Validity
(Sears / Anderson, Lindsay, & Bush)
Self-Reports
(Schwartz)
Writing in
Psychology (Sternberg / Bem / Kerr)
Note for Exam 3: You should read chapters 15, 16, 17,
and 18 in Whitley, but these will receive relatively less attention than the
other chapters.
Top of Page
My Home Page
My Courses
Social
Psychology Area
Psychology Department